SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 6

SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA
Surendra Kumar Setia and another – Appellant
Versus
Civil Judge Senior Division, Lucknow and others – Respondent


Shri Narayan Shukla,J.

Heard Mr.Jaspreet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr.N.K.Seth, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Sachin Garg, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.

2. Through the instant writ petition the petitioners have challenged the order dated 9.4.2008 (Annexure No.11), passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow on the application for temporary injunction registered as Application No.6-c filed in Regular Suit No.536 of 2008:Sudhir S.Halwasiya versus Rakesh Pandey C.E.O. Kaya Merico, whereby the trial court issued direction to the parties to maintain status quo on the spot, as also the order dated 10.4.2008, passed by the Civil Judge (South) (Junior Division), Lucknow on the application for temporary injunction registered as 6-c filed in Original Suit No.85 of 2008:Sudhir Halwasiya versus Surendra Kumar Setia, whereby the trial court has restrained the defendants from sub-letting out the property in dispute and handing over the possession to others.

3. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 10.4.2008, passed on the application No.C-13 moved under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for dismissal of the suit being under value and barr


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top