SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 687

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
V.K.Verma, J.
Dashrath and Another -Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Others -Respondent
Application U/S 482 No. 4846 of 2010
Decided On : 22-02-2010

Advocates:
Abhinav Prasad

Inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. can be used to refer matrimonial disputes to mediation for potential settlement.

Headnote:

Section 482 - Quashing of Summoning Order - Matrimonial Dispute - Mediation Centre Referral

Fact of the Case:

The applicants sought to quash the summoning order in a case involving matrimonial dispute and charges under section 498-A, 323 IPC read with section Dowry Prohibition Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court referred the matter to the Mediation Centre, High Court, Allahabad, with the consent of the applicants, and directed the deposit of Rs.5,000/- for the wife's expenses for attending mediation sessions.

Issues: Matrimonial dispute, quashing of summoning order, referral to Mediation Centre, compliance with payment and appearance before the Centre.

Ratio Decidendi: The court utilized the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to refer the matter to mediation, emphasizing the potential for settlement through mediation.

Final Decision: The case was stayed, and the Mediation Centre was directed to submit a report within one month. Non-compliance with appearance and payment would result in vacation of the stay.

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma,J.-

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A.

2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in shoraftert, 'the Cr.P.C.') to quash the summoning order dated 07.01.2010 in case no. 1137 of 2009 (Smt. Jagwati Vs. Dashrath and others) under section 498-A, 323 IPC read with section Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Azeemnagar District Rampur pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Rampur.

3. There is matrimonial dispute. The applicants' counsel has submitted that the matter be referred to the Mediation Centre, High Court, Allahabad, as there are chances to settle the dispute by the parties.

4. The matter is, therefore, with the consent of the applicants referred to the Mediation Centre, Allahabad High Court. The applicants shall deposit Rs.5,000/- within three weeks before the Mediation Centre by bank draft in the name of Smt. Rajbala w/o Sunil payable at the place where she is residing. The said bank draft shall be handed over to her on her appearing before the Mediation Centre towards her expenses for attending mediation sessions.

5. The Registry will send a notice through the CJM concerned within a week fixing 15.03.2010 for appearance of the parties, before the Mediation Centre at Allahabad High Court and it shall be mentioned in the notice that the bank draft of Rs.5,000/- deposited by the applicant shall be paid to her when she appears before the Centre. On that date, and on any future dates as directed by the Centre, the husband (applicant no. 1) and the wife aforesaid will appear before the Centre.

6. The Registry will send information of this order to the Mediation Centre within a week.

7. The Centre shall submit a report to this Court within one month from the date of appearance of the parties before it.

8. In case of any default by the applicants in making the appearances before the Mediation Centre on the dates fixed or making the aforesaid payment as directed above, the stay granted by this order shall stand automatically vacated forthwith.

9. Let this case be listed on 24.05.2010 along with the report of the Mediation Centre.

10. Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of the aforesaid case shall remain stayed.

11. In case there is any default by the applicants as above, the Mediation Centre should immediately communicate this fact to the office and office will list the case within a week before the Bench concerned, which may pass order for vacation of the order.

12. On the next date, the case will not be treated as tied up to this Bench and shall be listed before the appropriate Bench.

13. Copy of this order will not be issued unless steps are taken.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top