ANIL KUMAR
RAM KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
RAM MILAN – Respondent
Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.—Heard Sri D.P. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri H.N.B. Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.
2. The controversy involved in the present case relates to abadi land marked by letters Ka. Kha. Ga. Gha. And Ka. Ga. Cha. Chha. in the map attached with the paint, situated in village Barmauli Pargana Baraunsa, Tahsil and District Sultanpur.
3. Further in the instant appeal, the following pedigree is admitted between the parties :
DwarikaPrasad
Shivabadan Indar Umadutt Muneshwar
Nakched Ramjeet Ram Lakhan
(D.issuless) (D. Issueless) (Plaintif)
Bhagwat Badri
Mst. Rajdei @ Chhatanka Mst. Dhanraji @ Hurjhuda (D. issue less) (D. Issueless)
Jwala Pd. (D. Issueless) Sarvajit
Kunjbehari Shyambehari Ram Kumar Shiv Kumar
Parsnath Shambhnath
Kali Prasad Ram Charitra
Ram Newal Ram Milan Ram Newaj
Ram Bahore
4. It is also not disputed between the parties that the land in question belongs to Uma Dutt and after his death succeeded by his son Bhagwat and Badri thereafter by their widow Smt. Rajdei and Smt Dhanraji thus they are owner in possession of the aforesaid property respec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.