BHARAT BHUSHAN
SHAILENDRA KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Bharat Bhushan, J.—Heard Mr Kamal Krishna, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr Ghan Shyam Das, learned counsel for the revisionist, Mr Ram Sagar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and learned AGA for the state respondent.
2. This Criminal Revision is directed against the order dated 3.10.2012 passed by Additional Sessions judge, Court No. 1, Allahabad in S.T. No. 162 of 2011 (State v. Gyan Chand and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 199 of 2008, under Sections 302,120-B/34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Jhunsi, District Allahabad whereby the opposite party No. 2 has been declared juvenile in conflict with law on the basis of the High School Mark sheet.
3. The adumbrated facts of the case are that the Opposite party No. 2 is being prosecuted for having committed an offence punishable under Sections 302,120-B/34 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. During course of trial, an application dated 15.2.2011 was, moved on his behalf by mother of opposite party No. 2 (juvenile) stating therein that the date of birth of the opposite party No. 2 was 24.10.1990 on the date of incident i.e. 30.6.2008 as disclosed by his High
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.