SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1217

VINEET SARAN, VIJAY LAKSHMI
PRAVEEN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Nikhil Kumar for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—The petitioner was issued a caste certificate of ‘Kharwar’ caste on 15.6.2004 by the Tehsildar, Ghazipur. Another certificate, reiterating the earlier one dated 15.6.2004, was issued by the Tehsildar on 22.3.2007. Both the certificates have collectively been filed as annexure-2 to the writ petition. The issuance of said certificate is not in dispute by the parties.

2. The said ‘Kharwar’ caste has been declared as Scheduled Tribe by the U.P. Government Notification of 2002. On the basis of such caste certificate, vide appointment letter dated 1.3.2007, the petitioner was appointed as a driver in the C.R.P.F on 3.9.2009, the Commandant of the C.R.P.F Battalion sent communication for verification of the caste certificate issued in favour of the petitioner. The then Tehsildar verified the issuance of the caste certificate in favour of the petitioner, but besides this, on his own, he sent a communication to the Principal Secretary, Samaj Kalyan, Uttar Pradesh on 12.10.2009 to the effect that the caste certificate, certifying the caste of the petitioner as of ‘Kharwar’ was wrongly issued. According to the Tehsildar, the petitioner belongs to ‘Kamkar’ or ‘Kahar’ cast














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top