SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1289

RAKESH TIWARI, ASHOK PAL SINGH
BHUNESHWAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Anil Kumar Srivastava for the Appellant; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. The appellant has filed this intra Court appeal challenging the validity and correctness of the judgment and order dated 3.3.2011 passed by the Writ Court in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 43822 of 2008, Bhuneshar Rai v. The State of U.P. and others, whereby the aforesaid writ petition had been dismissed.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the instant appeal are that the appellant was working in work charge establishment as Chaukidar/helper since 26.6.1976 and continued to work as such till 30.4.2006. The proceedings for regularization was initiated by the respondents in April, 2006. The Executive Engineer issued letter dated 18.4.2006 directing the appellant to produce the certificates of educational qualification etc. for considering his case for regularization on 25.4.2006 so that formality could be completed. He retired on attaining age of superannuation on 30.4.2006.

4. It is contended that appellant ought to have been regularized in April, 2006 and that his entire services from 26.6.1976 be counted for his pension and other retiral benefits.

5. In support of his aforesaid contention,






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top