SUNEET KUMAR
ADESH KUMAR SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.D. Mandhyan, Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri Tarun Gaur, learned counsel appearing for respondent-Mandi Parishad.
2. The petitioner was working as Mandi Sahayak, a Class IV post since 1974 and the service condition of the petitioner is governed by U.P. Agriculture Produce Market Committees (Centralized) Service Regulations, 1984. The petitioner retired on 31.3.2013 on attaining the age of superannuation and after retirement the petitioner handed over charge. However, ‘No Dues Certificate’ was not issued to the petitioner, as such, the retirement dues was not paid. By letter dated 30.5.2013, the respondent No. 4, Secretary, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti (Agricultural Produce Market Committee), Bareilly, mentioned that in departmental annual audit for the years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 there was audit objection number 33 pertaining to the petitioner until and unless the audit objection is removed the ‘No Dues Certificate’ cannot be issued. Aggrieved, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent No. 3, Deputy Director (Admin./Marketing), Regional Office, State Agricultura
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.