SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1319

SUDHIR AGARWAL
Lata Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Atul Tej Kulshreshtha for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Atul Tej Kulshreshtha, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. A short question up for consideration in this case, “whether petitioner is entitled for extra ordinary pension under U.P. Police (Extra Ordinary Pension) Rules, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules, 1961”) as amended by U.P. Police (Extra Ordinary Pension) (First Amendment) Rules, 1975".

3. The facts, which are not in dispute, are that petitioner’s husband, a Constable in U.P. Police Force, was posted at Aligarh. While returning from performing his duty in office, on the way, suffered pain in chest and thereafter he was admitted in hospital where he was declared dead. The petitioner applied for extra ordinary pension under Rules 1961 as amended in 1975. The application was forwarded with favourable recommendation of Senior Superintendent of Police, Aligarh vide letter dated 13/14.6.2002 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition) but has been turned down by Finance Controller, U.P. Police Headquarter, Allahabad vide letter dated 22.4.2003 holding that petitioner’s husband has not died in the course of employment and therefore, petition












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top