DEVI PRASAD SINGH, MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Neetu Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—Heard learned counsel representing the parties. The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the U.P. Power Corporation Limited to pay compensation.
2. According to the petitioner’s counsel, petitioner’s husband on 8.7.2009, at about 6:30 a.m., Arimardan Singh came in contact with the insulated open cable installed by U.P. Power Corporation Limited. On being touched with the insulated cable, he was electrocuted and succumbed to injuries. Post mortem was conducted and the post mortem report revealed that he died because of electrocution. A copy of post mortem report of petitioner’s husband, has been annexed as Annexure 3 to the writ petition. After the death of petitioner’s husband, the petitioner requested the Executive Engineer of U.P. Power Corporation Limited for payment of compensation. A copy of representation submitted to the competent authority, has been filed as Anenxure No. 4 to the writ petition.
3. It has also been submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that the incident occurred because of lapse on the part of U.P. Power Corporation Limited a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.