By the Court.—Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel assisted by Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for NOIDA the applicant in Review petition (Respondent No. 3 in the writ petition).

2. This application has been filed under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC read with Chapter 5 Rule 12 of the High Court Rules, on behalf of respondent No. 3 praying that the review application be allowed and judgment dated 21.10.2011 be set aside /modified.

3. Full Bench of this Court after hearing Bunch of writ petitions leading writ petition No. 37443 of 2011 Gajraj and others v. State of U.P., decided all the writ petitions by judgment and order dated 21.10.2011. The bunch of writ petitions were decided after hearing the respondent No. 3 which has filed this review application. The respondent No. 3 in the leading writ petitions and other writ petitions had also filed their counter-affidavits supplementary counter-affidavits and had produced the original records. Considering the submissions of the parties and perusing the pleadings including the records the judgment was delivered.

4. Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant at very out set referred to the direction No. 5 of the ju