Hon’ble Ritu Raj Awasthi, J.—Since both the matters arise out of the same proceedings and are between the same parties, as such, they have been connected and heard together and are being decided by a common order.

The appellant-Smt. Preeti Aggarwal and the respondent-Mr. Vishwas Mittal are present in person before the Court. They are duly represented by their counsel.

Heard Mr. Vishal Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for appellant as well as Mr. Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for respondent.

The first appeal has been filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act against the judgment and decree dated 23.3.2011 passed in Original Suit No. 820 of 2009; Vishwas Mittal v. Smt. Priti Agarwal, whereby a decree of judicial separation has been passed by the learned Court below whereas the Cross Objection has been filed under Order XLI Rule 22 Code of Civil Procedure against the aforesaid order.

2. Learned counsel for appellant submitted that a suit for divorce was filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act by respondent. The appellant had contested the case in the Court below. By the impugned judgement the learned Court below has passed the decree of judicial separation under Sectio