Hon’ble Rakesh Tiwari, J.—Heard Shri Sidharth Khare, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri M.M. Sahai, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

2. By means of this appeal, the appellant challenges the validity and correctness of impugned judgement dated 23.7.2014 passed in Writ A No. 40927 of 2004, Prayag Narain Dubey v. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and others, which is a short one and reproduced below :

“The petitioner virtually seeks rectification of his date of birth at the fag end of his career. It is settled law that it cannot be done at that later stage. Firstly the record of the case has been summoned and after due verification it has been found that the date of birth recorded by the petitioner in his service book was the year 1952 and interpolation had been made in the record by writing 58. This finding has been recorded by the Court in its ordersheet dated 10.4.2012 but no amendment has been sought even otherwise the reason stated above the prayer sought by the petitioner cannot be granted.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed”

3. In the aforesaid judgment a reference has been made to the order dated 10.4.2012. This order pertain