SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1475

SHASHI KANT GUPTA
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CHAITANYA PRAKASH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M.K. Gupta for the Revisionist; A.K. Goyal for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Shashi Kant Gupta, J.—This revision has been filed against the order dated 7.5.2011 passed by Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Court No. 2, Meerut in Original Suit No. 710 of 2005, whereby the Issue Nos. 6 and 7 has been decided in favour of the plaintiffs/opposite parties.

2. The petitioner is a defendant in the suit. The plaintiffs filed a suit for partition and claimed shares in the property in dispute on the basis of the Will executed in their favour. One set of the defendant filed another Will claiming shares on the basis of the said Will. Another 2nd set of the defendants filed third Will claiming their share on the basis of the Will allegedly executed in their favour. The defendants moved an application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. for the return of the plaint on the ground that the claim on the basis of the Will cannot be adjudicated unless the Will is approved by the competent Court by issuing the probate under Section 213 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and, therefore, the plaint is liable to be returned.

3. In the suit, two issues, namely, issue Nos. 6 & 7 have been framed. It was framed that whether the suit is























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top