D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, P. K. S. BAGHEL
SHYAM NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
By the Court.—The appellants had moved a writ petition seeking three reliefs (i) the setting aside of an order dated 7 August 2014 by which their services as contractual employees were terminated on 7 August 2014 by the Director of the Indian Institute of Information Technology, the fourth respondent; (ii) the payment of salary for the months of July 2014 and for the period of 1 August to 7 August 2014; (iii) a direction that the appellants be permitted to perform their duties as before in a project of digitization of the IIIT, Allahabad at the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.
2. The learned Single Judge by the impugned judgment recorded the statement of the respondents that the petitioners-appellants had produced a no objection certificate and consequently directed that the balance of their salary for the previous month together with one month’s salary be released to them within 24 hours. The petition was disposed of. The original petitioners are in appeal.
3. The first grievance which has been raised is that the learned Single Judge has not dealt with the first and the third prayers and has disposed of the petition merely on the basis of the second prayer. Now, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.