PANKAJ NAQVI
MINAKSHI SONKAR SHASTRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Pankaj Naqvi, J.—Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Singh-II, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri R.P. Agarwal, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and learned A.G.A.
This criminal revision is preferred against order dated 18.1.2012 summoning the revisionist for an offence under Section 182 I.P.C.
2. The husband of the revisionist i.e. Anil Sonkar Shashtri lodged a complaint before D.I.G./S.S.P., Varanasi alleging that a plot in dispute was leased and allotted in the year 1999 by the State and possession delivered to the revisionist on 5.7.2010, from where she is allegedly carrying on her business. It further alleged that subsequently a dispute arose in respect of the aforesaid plot between the revisionist and opposite party No. 2 which led to the filing of a Writ Petition No. 47833 of 2010 by Banaras Export International of which O.P. No. 2 is the Managing Director, which is pending. It was alleged that on 11.12.2010, opposite party No. 2 alongwith his cohorts allegedly threatened forcible dispossession of the revisionists from the said plot on 11.1.2011, in which certain articles are alleged to have been taken
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.