ARUN TANDON, AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN
HET RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Akhtar Husain Khan, J.—Above three appeals have been filed against same judgement and order dated 6.2.1988 passed by Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad in S.T. No. 64 of 1986 (State v. Het Ram and others), under Sections 302/34 and 201 I.P.C., P.S. Jahanganj, District Farrukhabad. Therefore, these three appeals have been taken together and are being decided by a common judgement.
2. Aforesaid Criminal Appeal No. 322 of 1988 has been filed by accused-appellants Jageshwar, Rajvir and Smt. Sonwati, aforesaid Criminal Appeal No. 329 of 1988 has been filed by accused-appellants Het Ram, Manohar and Ramvir and aforesaid Criminal Appeal No. 476 of 1988 has been filed by accused-appellants Chhakku Lal and Dr. Shiv Kumar against aforesaid judgement and order dated 6.2.1988 passed by Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad.
Vide aforesaid impugned judgement and order, learned Special Judge (E.C. Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Farrukhabad has convicted accused-appellants Het Ram, Jageshwar, Manohar, Ramvir, Rajvir and Smt. Sonwati for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 I.P.C. and Section 201 I.P.C. and has sentenced
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.