SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1827

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : ARUN TANDON AND AKHTAR HUSAIN KHAN, JJ.
GANPAT AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ….Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal No. 1240 of 1989, decided on 11th December, 2014)

Advocates:
Counsel :
Kundan Singh, Brij Raj Singh and Harish Chandra Tiwari for the Appellants; A.G.A. and Hari Krishan Mishra for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:(A) (Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 148, 307/149—Evidence Act, 1872—Section 114 (1), Illustration (e)—Murder—Unlawful assembly—FIR not delayed—Prosecution witnesses highly reliable—Statement of P.W. 1 complainant may not be discarded merely on ground that he has not suffered injuries in occurrence—Further, testimony of witnesses may not be discarded merely on ground of relationship—No material contradiction in statements of witnesses—Motive of occurrence proved—Lantern was burning at time of occurrence—Conviction upheld.

       (B) Evidence Act, 1872—Section 114 (1), Illustration (e)—Presumption—Judicial acts—According to Illustration (e) of Section 114 (e), Court may presume that Judicial and Official acts regularly performed. Appeal Dismissed.

(Delivered by Hon'ble Akhtar Husain Khan,J)

Present criminal appeal has been filed by accused-appellants Ganpat, Ram Shanker, Virendra, Shripal and Iqbal against common judgement dated 3.6.1989 passed by Sessions Judge, Etah in Session Trial No. 362 of 1985 (State Vs. Genda Lal and others) and Session Trial No. 217 of 1986 (State Vs. Shripala and another), under Sections 148, 302, 302 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. and 307 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C., Police Station Sahawar, District Etah whereby learned Sessions Judge has convicted accused-appellants Ganpat, Ram Shanker, Virendra, Shripal and Iqabal for offences punishable under Sections 148 I.P.C., 307 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. and Section 302 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. and has sentenced thereunder each of said appellants with rigorous imprisonment for two years, five years and life imprisonment respectively.

Criminal Appeal No. 1355 of 1989 (Genda Lal Vs. State of U.P.) was also filed by co-accused appellant Genda Lal against aforesaid judgement and order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Etah in aforesaid session trials whereby, he has convicted co-accused appellant Genda Lal for offences punishable under Section 148 I.P.C., 307 I.P.C. read with Section 149 I.P.C. and 302 I.P.C. and has sentenced him thereunder to rigorous imprisonment for two years, five years and life imprisonment respectively but co-accused appellant Genda Lal died during pendency of appeal, therefore his appeal has already been abated.

Accused-appellants Ganpat, Ram Shanker and Shripal also died during pendency of appeal. Present appeal also stands abated in respect of them.

Heard Sri Harish Chandra Tiwari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Brijraj Singh, Advocate on behalf of appellants as well as Shri M. S. Yadav, learned AGA assisted by Sri Hari Krishan Mishra, Advocate for informant.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused records.

According to F.I.R. (Ex. Ka-1), in brief prosecution story is that in the intervening night of 23/24.3.1985, complainant Netrapal and his father Sonpal were sleeping in verandah of Baithak (Drawing Room) and his uncle Raghuvar Dayal and brother Bhoop Singh were sleeping inside Baithak (Drawing Room). The lantern was burning in the Verandah. At about 12.30 in night, accused-appellants Genda Lal, Ganpat, Shripal, Virendra, Ram Shanker and Iqbal came armed with gun and Kattas. They got awaken father of complainant Netrapal and asked him where is Chandra Pal, in the meantime, complainant Netrapal also awoke. Father of complainant told them that Chandra Pal is pulling rickshaw in Delhi. He is not at the house. Thereafter, accused-appellant Genda Lal abused and asked where is Bhoop Singh. He further added that they shall return today after taking revenge of enmity. In the meantime, Bhoop Singh brother of complainant and Raghuar Dayal, uncle of complainant, who were sleeping inside Baithak, came out from Baithak, after having heard noise seeing them accused appellant Ganpat exhorted whereupon accused Genda Lal opened fire at Bhoop Singh. Bhoop Singh sustained injuries of fire and fell down. Other accused appellants also fired with their arms. Complainant Netrapal came out of Varandah and raised alarm whereupon other people of village came and raised alarm. Thereafter, aforesaid accused-appellants ran away through lane (Gali). At the time of running away they were making fire.

According to F.I.R. (Ex. Ka-1), Sonpal father of complainant and uncle Raghuvar Dayal also suffered injuries of fire made by aforesaid accused-appellants. According to F.I.R. (Ex. Ka-1) complainant and witnesses has seen all accused-appellants and has identified them in the light of lantern.

According to F.I.R. (Ex. Ka-1), after occurrence, complainant Netrapal went to police station leaving dead body of his brother Bhoop Singh on spot and presented written report (Ex. Ka-1) in P.S. Sahawar, District Etah.

First Information Report (Ex. Ka-1) was presented by c


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top