Hon’ble Vijay Lakshmi, J.—This Intra Court Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 18.4.2012 passed in Writ-A No. 38093 of 2005, Satya Dev Singh Yadav v. State of U.P. and others, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant has been dismissed.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and have perused the record.

3. On 3.2.2015 when this case was listed earlier the following order was passed:

“This case is listed peremptorily today.

This Special Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.4.2012 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.

The petitioner-appellant was terminated from his services for having performed bigamous marriage in contravention of Rule 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1956.

Learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant submitted that the services of the petitioner-appellant were not liable to be terminated in view of the clear provisions of sub-rule 3 of