DINESH MAHESHWARI, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
BRIJ LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari, J.—The petitioner, a licensee of fair price shop at Village Panchayat Shiv Charan Deeh, Block Tulsipur, District Balrampur, has preferred this writ petition seeking to question the order dated 29.12.2014 (Annexure 1) passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tulsipur, suspending his license and calling upon him to submit written explanation.
2. The basic contention of the petitioner against the impugned suspension order is that his license has been suspended on a complaint made by the respondent No. 3 but without affording any opportunity of hearing to him and even without associating him in the process of preliminary inquiry. With reference to a decision of this Court in the case of Harpal v. State of U.P. And another, 2008(3) ADJ 36, it is contended that for want of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner at the time of inquiry or at least before suspending his license, the order impugned offends the Government Order dated 29.7.2004 which clearly mandates compliance of the principles of natural justice before suspending/canceling fair price shop license. An interim order dated 22.12.2014 passed by a coordinate Bench in Misc. Bench No. 12719 of 2014
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.