SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 281

DINESH MAHESHWARI, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
BRIJ LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
M. Waris Farooqui for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari, J.—The petitioner, a licensee of fair price shop at Village Panchayat Shiv Charan Deeh, Block Tulsipur, District Balrampur, has preferred this writ petition seeking to question the order dated 29.12.2014 (Annexure 1) passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Tulsipur, suspending his license and calling upon him to submit written explanation.

2. The basic contention of the petitioner against the impugned suspension order is that his license has been suspended on a complaint made by the respondent No. 3 but without affording any opportunity of hearing to him and even without associating him in the process of preliminary inquiry. With reference to a decision of this Court in the case of Harpal v. State of U.P. And another, 2008(3) ADJ 36, it is contended that for want of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner at the time of inquiry or at least before suspending his license, the order impugned offends the Government Order dated 29.7.2004 which clearly mandates compliance of the principles of natural justice before suspending/canceling fair price shop license. An interim order dated 22.12.2014 passed by a coordinate Bench in Misc. Bench No. 12719 of 2014




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top