SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(All) 1975

SUDHIR AGARWAL
MEHBOOB – Appellant
Versus
ZAHIRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Amit Verma for the Petitioner; Pradeep Kumar Srivastava for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Amit Verma, learned counsel for petitioner; Sri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Advocate, for respondents; and, perused the record.

2. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as under.

3. One Zahira, respondent No. 1, instituted Original Suit No. 306 of 1994 impleading Tasadduq and Zakir Husain as defendants in the Court of Munsif Hawali, Saharanpur for cancellation of registered sale-deed dated 13.5.1994, which was executed by defendants in their favour representing plaintiff-respondent No. 1 as major though on the date of execution of sale-deed she was minor. The suit was contested by defendants, i.e., respondent Nos. 3 and 4 by filing their written statement. Trial Court, i.e., Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, Saharanpur decreed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 28.1.2009 to the extent of declaring sale-deed dated 13.5.1994 a nullity. Trial Court, however, declined to grant relief of permanent injunction holding that plaintiff has failed to prove her possession over property in dispute, and, on the contrary, property in dispute is in possession of defendants, therefore, injunction as sought, cannot be granted.

4.












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top