SUDHIR AGARWAL
MEHBOOB – Appellant
Versus
ZAHIRA – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—Heard Sri Amit Verma, learned counsel for petitioner; Sri Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Advocate, for respondents; and, perused the record.
2. The facts giving rise to the present writ petition are as under.
3. One Zahira, respondent No. 1, instituted Original Suit No. 306 of 1994 impleading Tasadduq and Zakir Husain as defendants in the Court of Munsif Hawali, Saharanpur for cancellation of registered sale-deed dated 13.5.1994, which was executed by defendants in their favour representing plaintiff-respondent No. 1 as major though on the date of execution of sale-deed she was minor. The suit was contested by defendants, i.e., respondent Nos. 3 and 4 by filing their written statement. Trial Court, i.e., Civil Judge (Junior Division), Hawali, Saharanpur decreed the suit vide judgment and decree dated 28.1.2009 to the extent of declaring sale-deed dated 13.5.1994 a nullity. Trial Court, however, declined to grant relief of permanent injunction holding that plaintiff has failed to prove her possession over property in dispute, and, on the contrary, property in dispute is in possession of defendants, therefore, injunction as sought, cannot be granted.
4.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.