SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 240

SUNEET KUMAR
VISHAL KUMAR RATHOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.P. Singh and K.S. Kushwaha for the Petitioner; C.S.C. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Suneet Kumar, J.—The mother of the petitioner Smt. Saroj Kumari was working as an Assistant Teacher in Primary School Guchawali, Jahangirabad, District Bulandshahar, died in harness on 1.10.2008 leaving behind two sons including the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he is qualified and eligible for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher in a Primary School, run by Basic Siksha Parisad, Allahabad. The respondent No. 3, Secretary U.P. Basic Education Board, Allahabad rejected the application of the petitioner for appointment under the dying in harness rules on 27.4.2010, for the reason, that the father of the petitioner is an employee of the State Government and was drawing salary, hence the petitioner is not entitled to appointment.

2. The order dated 27.4.2010 and the consequential order dated 3.5.2010 passed by respondent No. 2, Secretary, Basic Education Board, Allahabad and respondent No. 3, District Basic Siksha Adhikari, Bulandshahar, respectively, is being questioned in the present writ petition.

3. I have heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the records.

4. It is not disputed that the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of D





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top