ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA I
NITIN PAL (MINOR) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, J.—List is revised. Learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the State are present. No one turns up on behalf of the respondent No. 2.
Heard Sri Vinay Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the State.
By means of the instant revision, the revisionist Harpal father/natural guardian son of Nakli has sought bail of his minor son Nitin Pal, in Case No. 9/11 of 2013 State v. Nitin Pal, arising out of Case Crime No. 18 of 2013 under Sections 376(2) (g), 364 I.P.C. Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffarnagar, with the prayer that the impugned order dated 4.9.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar, in Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2013, affirming the order dated 22.7.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarnagar, be set aside and the application moved for bail of delinquent minor be allowed.
2. vide order dated 23.3.2015, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar was directed to submit compliance report pursuant to the order dated 16.1.2014 passed by this Court whereby he was directed to submit a report regarding service of notice upon the respondent No. 2. Comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.