SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 326

ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA I
NITIN PAL (MINOR) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Pankaj Bharti and Vinay Sharma for the Revisionist; A.G.A. for the Opposite Parties.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I, J.—List is revised. Learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the State are present. No one turns up on behalf of the respondent No. 2.

Heard Sri Vinay Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the State.

By means of the instant revision, the revisionist Harpal father/natural guardian son of Nakli has sought bail of his minor son Nitin Pal, in Case No. 9/11 of 2013 State v. Nitin Pal, arising out of Case Crime No. 18 of 2013 under Sections 376(2) (g), 364 I.P.C. Police Station Civil Lines, District Muzaffarnagar, with the prayer that the impugned order dated 4.9.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarnagar, in Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2013, affirming the order dated 22.7.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Muzaffarnagar, be set aside and the application moved for bail of delinquent minor be allowed.

2. vide order dated 23.3.2015, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar was directed to submit compliance report pursuant to the order dated 16.1.2014 passed by this Court whereby he was directed to submit a report regarding service of notice upon the respondent No. 2. Comp
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top