Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—The contemnor is present in person and stated that whatever reply he intended to file, is already on record and now he does not want to file any reply or adduce any evidence, therefore, the Court should decide the matter after considering his submissions.

2. Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, learned Special Counsel nominated by the Court to assist in this criminal contempt has been heard in support of proceedings. We may also put on record that a number of counsels have put in appearance on behalf of contemnor, whose names are also shown in the cause list, instead the contemnor appeared in person and requested that he should be permitted to defend in person which we have allowed. The contemnor has been heard in person at length.

3. This criminal contempt application was registered on receiving a letter dated 20.4.2012 from District Judge, Budaun, addressed to Registrar General of this Court and enclosing therewith reference letter dated 16.4.2012 of Sri Akhilesh Kumar, Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Budaun. The reference was received in this Court on 27.4.2012, whereafter it was placed before Hon’ble the Chief Justice and His Lordship approved the same on 2.7.2012 to place it before the Bench dealing with criminal contempt for initiating appropriate contempt proceedings. Pursuant thereto, a Division Bench, on 18.7.2012, having been satisfied, prima facie, that Sri Magendra Pal Singh, Advocate (hereinafter referred to as “contemnor”), practising in District Judgeship, Badaun, has attempted to scandalize Presiding Officer as also the Court and lowered down authority of the Court, took cognizance of the reference and issued notice to the contemnor. The contemnor put in appearance and submitted reply alongwith his affidavit dated 17.10.2012. In para 6, he said :

“That so far as the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner himself is concerned, he is neither MOHAN DAS KARAM CHAND GANDHI nor he is ANNA HAJARE, but he always opposed Corruption which is now present in every Sphere and almost in all the Departments in the Country, through out. The instant Reference/Contempt in the blatant Illustration of such the OPPOSING by the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner since upon the Instruction, Dictation and Direction of his Client, namely SRI AMAR PAL who himself requested the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner to move the Application 146-C Dated 23 rd April 2011 and subsequently, namely SRI AMAR PAL SINGH, filed his own Affidavit dated 06th May 2011, in support of the aforesaid Application. So the Contempt Proceedings, if were require should be imitated against SRI AMAR PAL, son of Late CHANDRA PAL, the Deceased Judgment-debtor, who filed his own Affidavit and the Application, through Counsel/Advocate i.e. the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner being his Attorney/Advocate in the aforesaid Court and as such the Contempt Proceedings launched, only against the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner are certainly under Malice, while abusing the Powers, being the Presiding Officer of the Court concerned, with an intention to take all the Lawyers in his GRIP/SUPERVENESS.”

4. Thus, whatever has been said and alleged against the Court and Presiding Officer, is ex facie admitted by contemnor but his stand is that he represented his client, and, on his instructions, said all those things, therefore, contempt proceedings should be initiated against his client. He has also said that the same having been initiated only against contemnor, is malicious and amounts to abuse of power.

5. Then in para 7, he said that his detailed counter-affidavit is under preparation but still he is tendering apology with a request to drop contempt proceedings. It reads as under :

“That in view of the above situations and circumstances, the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner is do here by begs APOLOGY and though the Applicant/(Alleged) Guilty Person/Contemner has got Drafted the Complete Counter-