SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 423

KRISHNA MURARI, PRATYUSH KUMAR
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. , ALLAHABAD – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.C. Srivastava for the Appellant; Siddharth Srivastava and S.D. Ojha for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Krishna Murari, J.—Heard Shri S.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Siddharth Srivastava, learned counsel for the claimant-respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri S.D. Ojha for respondent No. 4.

2. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short the Act) has been filed by Insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 31.5.2000 passed by Additional District Judge/Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Meerut awarding a sum of Rs. 5,85,500/- as compensation to the claimant-respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

3. Facts, in short, giving rise to the dispute are as under.

A claim petition claiming compensation to the tune of Rs. 20 lacs was preferred by the claimant-respondents on the allegation that on 3.9.1997 when deceased Sobha Ram was going on his moped No. U.P. 15D 1960 to his office at about 10 am, when he reached telephone exchange, then near SSD Crossing, Bus No. UHN 1152, which was being driven in rash and negligent manner, hit the moped, which caused grievous injuries and resulted into death of Sobha Ram. It was further pleaded that the deceased was aged 55 years and was working in CDA Pension office and his total income including that






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top