PANKAJ MITHAL
LALPARI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SHIV MOHAN MISRA – Respondent
Hon’ble Pankaj Mithal, J.—One Narsingh Prasad Gupta was the original owner of the suit property which is a dwelling house. In the said house one Shyam Kishore Misra, was living as a tenant. At one point of time Narsingh Prasad Gupta was in need of financial help. He borrowed a sum of Rs. 4000/- from the tenant Shyam Kishore Misra. An agreement dated 4.11.1970 was entered into between them providing that Narsingh Prasad Gupta would return the borrowed amount of Rs. 4000/- with interest @ 2% per month to Shyam Kishore Misra within a period of 8 years and in the event the amount is not returned he would transfer the said house in favour of his heirs/nominees for a sale consideration of Rs. 15000/-. In the event of non-payment of the borrowed amount with interest within the stipulated time the agreement w.e.f. 5.11.1978 would be an agreement to sell the property and that Narsingh Prasad Gupta would execute the sale-deed within three years thereafter on receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs. 8,210/- after adjusting a sum of Rs. 6,790/- as the principal amount borrowed with interest.
2. The aforesaid Naringh Prasad Gupta on 20.3.1975 also executed a registered agreement
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.