SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 538

RAVINDRA SINGH, RAGHVENDRA KUMAR
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
SHAHJAD – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
A.G.A. for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Raghvendra Kumar, J.—Heard learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P.

2. The application for leave to appeal has been instituted against the judgment and order dated 1.9.2005 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Meerut in Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2000, whereby acquitting the accused, Shahjad and Videsh for the offence under Sections 364, 302 and 201 IPC and acquitting Udaiveer @ Vipin for the offence under Sections 302 and 201 IPC of Police Stations Parikshitgarh in Case Crime No. 291 of 1999, district Meerut.

3. The FIR reveals that on 6.9.1999, Swadesh was accompanied by accused, Shahjad and Videsh while he was going for depositing the electricity bill at Mawana. The FIR of the incident was lodged with the police on 21.10.1999. The accused, Shahjad and Videsh returned back to the village after four or five days. Upon querry with Shahjad and Videsh they did not reply satisfactorily. Thereafter, FIR was lodged by PW-1, Aneeta, wife of Swadesh.The FIR of the incident dated 6.9.1999 was lodged with the police on 27.10.1999 at 17.30 hours. Thereafter, the investigation of the case commenced after adhering with the procedur
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top