Hon’ble Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J.—This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 26.8.2009 and order of sentence dated 28.8.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. Court No. 16, Bulandshahr in Sessions Trial No. 625/2006, State v. Omkar Singh and others, case crime No. 18/2006, under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 120-B IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Aurangabad, Bulandshahr and Sessions Trial No. 626/2006, State v. Omkar Singh, case crime No. 19/2006 under Section 25 of Arms Act, P.S. Aurangabad, Bulandshahr.

2. Prosecution case in brief has been that complainant Indrapal Singh is resident of Khalikpur, P.S. Ahar, Bulandshahr. His daughter Lalitesh aged about 20 years was married on 17.2.2005 with Omkar son of Man Singh, resident of Surjawali, P.S. Aurangabad, Bulandshahr. In this marriage complainant had given sufficient dowry. But he was informed that his daughter was harassed because of demand of dowry. Therefore on 5.2.2006 at about 8:00 p.m. in night complainant proceeded from village Ilna to Surjawali with his maternal cousin brothers. They were going through eastern road of Ilna canal, then at about 8:30 p.m. in evening