SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 602

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SHASHI KANT GUPTA AND OM PRAKASH-VII, JJ.
CHHANGUR BHAR AND OTHERS ....Appellants
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal No. 2587 of 1982, decided on 15th May, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
V.P. Srivastva, Lav Srivastava, N.N. Singh, D.M. Singh (A.C.), R.K. Sinha, Ranjay Kumar and Shyam Kumar for the Appellants; A.G.A., Rajeev Kumar Singh and Rajiv Lochan Shukla for the Respondent.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 302, 147, 149, 308, 323, 324 and 325—Murder—Conviction—Appeal against—Scope of—Altercation took place between parties as mentioned in FIR—Admittedly prosecution witnesses when reached the spot, appellants-accused assaulted them—In case of free fight, it is not possible to ascertain as to who was the aggressor—Neither side entitled to right of private defence—In such cases, each individual is liable for his own act—Both parties received injuries—Trial Court’s view that the complainant side were acting in their right of private defence is not in accordance with the evidence—Case of sudden fight established—Both parties armed with weapons causing injuries to each other—Appellant held guilty of offence punishable under Section 324, IPC for voluntary causing hurt to deceased—Impugned conviction under Sections 302, 323 read with Sections 149/147 altered to Section 324—Element of common object ruled out—Sentence modified. [Paras 53 to 90]

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Om Prakash-VII, J.—This criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellants Chhangur Bhar, Baijnath Bhar, Dukharan, Ghoora, Ghurpatari, Swaminath and Kailash against the judgment and order dated 18.9.1982 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No. 18 of 1981 pertaining to crime No. 141-A of 1979, Police Station Haldharpur, District Ballia whereby accused-appellant Chhangur has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (in short “the IPC”) and sentenced to life imprisonment. He has also been convicted under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment and under Section 323 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment. Accused-appellant Baij Nath has been convicted under Section 308 IPC and sentenced to two years’ rigorous imprisonment. He has also been convicted under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment and under Section 323 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment. Accused-appellants Dukharan, Ghoora, Ghurpatari, Swami Nath and Kailash have been convicted under Section 325 read with 149 IPC and sentenced to two years’ rigorous imprisonment. They have also been convicted under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment and under Section 323 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced to six months’ rigorous imprisonment. It was further directed that all the implanted sentences shall run concurrently.

2. During pendency of the appeal, appellants Baij Nath, Dukharan, Ghurpatari, Swami Nath and Kailash are reported to have died. Hence the appeal abates so far as they are concerned. We are required to consider this appeal only with regard to the appellants Chhangur and Ghoora.

3. The prosecution story, in a nutshell, as it emerges from the written report (Ex.Ka-1) is that the informant, Ram Cheej Singh was the resident of village Ratohi (Nawalpur), P.S. Haldharpur, District Ballia. On 29.10.1979, the informant’s ‘pattidar’ Ram Sarikh Singh had been irrigating his field since 4:00 a.m. using the water of the eastern drain of the Government Tube-well. At about 7:00 a.m., accused Chhangur, Baijnath, Ghoora, Dukharan, Ghurpatari, Swaminath son of Dewoo and Kailash, having armed themselves with lathi, danda and spade, came there and forcibly broke the ‘pucca’ drain and diverted the water of the said drain to the field of accused Chhangur. On the protest of Ram Sarikh Singh, the accused persons started abusing him and creating a ruckus. Hearing the uproar, the informant Ram Cheej Singh, his father Gaya Singh, Shiva Nand and Ram Surat Singh rushed on the spot to intervene, thereupon the accused persons began to beat the informant and his men on the exhortation of accused Baij Nath. Accused Baij Nath struck a lathi blow on the head of Gaya Singh, whereupon he fell down on the ground. Thereafter, the accused Chhangur struck a blow on the head of Gaya Singh with the back-head (Pasha) of the Spade by which he fell down and was profusely bleeding from his head. On hearing the noise from the spot, Ganga, Ram Roop, Swami Nath Singh (P.W.3) son of Basudev Singh and many other villagers arrived there and intervened. The informant Ram Cheej Singh, Shiva Nand and Gaya Singh received injuries during the incident. Gaya Singh became unconscious after receiving the head injury from the reverse side of the Spade.

4. After the incident, the informant Ram Cheej Singh (P.W.1) prepared the written report (Ex.Ka-1) and carried Gaya Singh on a cot to the Police Station Haldharpur to lodge the First Information Report on the same day. Police registered the First Information Report vide chick report (Ex.Ka-2) on the basis of written report (Ex.Ka-1) at 8:40 a.m. and entries in the General Diary was also made. Carbon copy of the entries to the General Diary have been proved as Ex.Ka-3. Initially, the case was registered against the accused persons under Sections 1



















































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top