D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, NARAYAN SHUKLA
PRABUDDHA NAGRIK CHETNA MANCH GONDA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
By the Court.—The petition invoking the jurisdiction in public interest seeks two reliefs in regard to the law pertaining to elections to Parliament and the State legislature. The first relief is in respect of Rule 64 of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 (Rules of 1961) under which a candidate to whom the largest number of valid votes have been given, is to be declared to be elected under Section 66 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (Act of 1951). The petitioner seeks a mandamus by this Court to refrain from giving effect to the expression “to whom the largest number of valid votes have been given”.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that Sections 14 and 15 of the Act of 1951 contain no provision under which a candidate with the largest number of votes is to be declared to be elected. Section 14 provides for a notification of a general election to the House of the People. Sub-section (2) of Section 14 empowers the President by notification to call upon all Parliamentary constituencies to elect members in accordance with the provisions of the Act on such dates as may be recommended by the Election Commission. A similar provision is contained in Section 15 i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.