ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
(Lucknow Bench)
BEFORE : RAJAN ROY, J.
K.M. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, MURIYA GHATAMPUR, KANPUR NAGAR AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ....Respondents
(Civil Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 4643, 4644 of 2013 and 7307 of 2014, decided on 29th July, 2015)
Hon’ble Rajan Roy, J.—Heard Sri Prashant Chandra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Akshat Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri I.H. Faruqui, appearing on behalf of opposite party No. 2, National Minority Commission, Sri Z. Jilani, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, Sri Mansoor Ahmad, Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Rahul Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State in writ petition No. 7307/2014 and Sri S.B. Pandey for Union of India alongwith Sri Raj Kumar Singh.
2. All these writ petitions involve common question of facts and law, therefore, they have been heard and are being decided together by a common judgment.
3. Writ Petition No. 4643 (MS) of 2013 has been heard as a leading writ petition.
4. By means of these writ petitions, the petitioners, who are educational institutions claiming minority status have challenged the order passed by the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Commission’) by which the application submitted by them for granting No Objection Certificate for establishing a minority educational institution and for declaration of their status as a minority has been rejected. The petitioners in W.P. No. 4643 (MS) of 2013 and 4644(MS) of 2013 are also assailing the Government order dated 19.8.2014 passed by the State Government during pendency of this writ petition on an application having been filed by them in pursuance to interim directions of this Court, whereby it has been held that the authority competent to give said declaration is the Commission and not the State Government. The petitioners are also seeking a declaration that they are deemed minority educational institutions under Section 10(3) of the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 2004).
5. The facts of the case, in brief, are as under :
Out of seven (7) founding members of petitioner No. 1, in Writ Petition No. 4643(MS) of 2013 five (5) embraced Buddhism on 8.8.2008. Certificates issued by Bhartiya Budh Samiti, Budh Vihar, Risaldar Park, Lucknow stating that said founding members had adopted Buddhism in place of their earlier religion i.e. Hinduism voluntarily and had been administered Baudh Diksha and are followers of Budhism, are on record. On 4.10.2008 the society of petitioners was registered, which runs the institution in question. On 20.8.2009 the NCTE granted recognition for 100 seats of B.Ed course for academic session 2009-10. The institution was established in the year 2009. On 16.6.2010 affiliation was granted to the institution in question under Section 37(2) of the Act, 1973 w.e.f. 1.7.2010 for B.Ed. Application was submitted before the Commission for grant of No Objection Certificate for establishing a minority educational institution on 26.12.2012. On 13.3.2013 the Tehsildar issued certificates to the founding member of the Institution to the effect that they belong to a minority community i.e. Buddhists.
6. Likewise, out of eighteen (18) founding members of petitioner No. 2 twelve (12) embraced Buddhism on 15.6.2003/4.5.2004. The institutions were established in the year 2006 as mentioned in the application submitted before the Commission. On 9.9.2006 the NCTE granted recognition to the said institution for 100 seats of B.Ed course w.e.f. 2006-07. On 22.11.2007, the requisite affiliation was granted by the State Government for the said B.Ed course. The society which at present runs the institution was surprisingly registered subsequently on 24.4.2009 as is evident from Annexure 9 to the writ petition. The application for grant of no objection certificate was submitted on 26.12.2012. On 13.3.2013 the certificates were issued by the Tehsildar in respect of twelve (12) founding members that they belong to a minority community i.e. Buddhists.
7. It is not in dispute that Buddhists have been declared as minority community both by the State Government and Cen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.