SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 738

DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
RAJENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/FAST TRACK COURT-I, GONDA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora, J.—Heard learned counsel for parties and perused the record.

2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 7.7.2008, passed by the Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court, Gonda (Opposite Party No. 1) whereby his application for amendment of the plaint at appellate stage has been rejected.

3. Facts of the case, in nut-shell, are that the petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gonda in the year 1993, which was registered as Regular Suit No. 1036 of 1993, for restraining opposite party No. 2-Chandrika Singh from interfering in his peaceful possession over the property in dispute. Opposite Party No. 2-Chandrika Singh filed written statement on 28.1.1994 denying the allegations made in the plaint and alleged that he is in possession over the property in dispute. Accordingly, survey commission was issued by the Court below and the Survey Commissioner submitted his report which was confirmed subject to other evidence on record. Ultimately, the said suit was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 18.1.2006 (Annexure 4). Being aggrieved against the sai



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top