SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 758

AJAI LAMBA, ASHOK PAL SINGH
SHAHEEN PARVEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Omkar Singh for the Petitioners; A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

By the Court.—Shaheen Parveen and Mohd. Sarfaraj have approached this Court to seek a writ in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash First Information Report bearing Case Crime No. -121 of 2014 under Sections 363/366 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Madiyawan, District Lucknow (Annexure-1).

2. Case set up by the petitioners is that the petitioners having attained marriageable age got married. Marriage, however, is not being accepted by respondent No. 4 who happens to be the mother of petitioner No. 1. Under the circumstances, aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner No. 1 got married of her own accord, impugned criminal proceedings have been initiated.

3. Short counter-affidavit on behalf of the Prosecuting Agency has been filed today alongwith medical examination report of the victim/prosecutrix and also the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. on 8.5.2015, which is taken on record.

4. In the short counter-affidavit, it has been stated that the prosecutrix/victim is carrying a pregnancy of 31 weeks (Annexure -SCA-2). In paragraph 4 of the affidavit, it has been admitted that the prosecutrix/victim did not support the prosecution case in h




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top