RITU RAJ AWASTHI
RAJA RAM – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, SULTANPUR – Respondent
Hon’ble Ritu Raj Awasthi, J.—Heard Mr.Abid Ali, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.V.S.Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 whereas learned Standing Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1,2 and 3.
2. This writ petition was filed in the year 1997 challenging the order dated 1.1.1997 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation as well as the order dated 16.9.1996 passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation and the order dated 24.3.1994 passed by the Consolidation Officer in the proceedings pertaining to the objections filed under Section 9A (2) U.P.C.H. Act. by the petitioners before the Consolidation Officer which were rejected and the appeal filed by the petitioners was dismissed and the appeal of opposite party No. 4 was allowed. The revision filed by the petitioners against the order of Settlement Officer of Consolidation was also dismissed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation.
3. At the time of admission, the Court had entertained the writ petition on limited issue as to whether the Deputy Director of Consolidation while exercising jurisdiction under Section 48, U.P.C.H. Act can impose cost and whether the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.