SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 830

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : SURENDRA VIKRAM SINGH RATHORE AND RAGHVENDRA KUMAR, JJ.
KALLOO JAMADAR ....Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. ....Respondent
(Criminal Appeal Nos. 7668 and 7149 of 2009, decided on 11th August, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
J.N. Singh and Arimardan Singh for the Appellants; A.G.A. for the Respondent.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860—Sections 364-A, 148, 307/149—Kidnapping—Conviction—Victim of offence has nowhere identified appellant as person who was involved in his kidnapping or in his confinement for nine days—Impugned Judgment unsustainable under law—Accused is acquitted. [Paras 22 and 23]

       Result; Appeals Allowed.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J.—Under challenge in the aforesaid criminal appeals is the judgment and order dated 9.11.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court No. 2, Kannauj, in Sessions Trial No. 22 of 1994 arising out of Case Crime No. 118 of 1994, under Section 364-A IPC, Police Station Kannauj, and Sessions Trial No. 200 of 2001 arising out of Case Crime No. 120 of 1994, under Sections 148, 149, 307 IPC, Police Station Kannauj. Alongwith the aforesaid sessions trials, two other sessions trials were also tried, which were against co-accused Ram Niwas and Iqbal. Accused Ram Niwas was absconding and accused Iqbal died during trial. So the case of the accused Ram Niwas was separated and the case of the accused Iqbal was abated. Appellant Kalloo Jamadar was convicted in both the sessions trials and was held guilty for the offence under Section 364-A IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also with fine of Rs. 10,000/-. He was further convicted for the offence under Sections 148 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. He was also held guilty for the offence under Section 307/149 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and also with fine of Rs. 2,000/-. In default of payment of entire fine amount, the appellant was directed to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently

2. In the aforesaid sessions trials, co-accused Musheer Ali was also tried with appellant Kalloo Jamadar, however, he was acquitted of the charges leveled against him.

3. In brief, as per the prosecution case, on 11.2.1994 at about 5.30 p.m., the victim of the offence namely Nathoo Ram, aged about 75 years, who happens to be the father of the complainant Ram Das Kushwaha, had gone to his tube-well, situated at the outskirt of the villlage Kanpatiapur, to sleep there. When the complainant reached there in the following morning then his father was missing, as such, he searched his father but he could not be traced out. On 12.2.1994, an information of missing of his father was given at the concerned police station. Thereafter, the complainant got a letter demanding ransom of Rs. 2,60,000/- and the said letter also contained threats of dire consequences to the victim of the offence. So the First Information Report of this case was lodged by the complainant on 19.2.1994 at 22.30 hours. After registration of the case, the investigation started and the place of occurrence was inspected. During investigation, on 20.2.1994 at about 07.45 a.m., the police party got a secret information that the alleged victim Nathoo Ram has been kept in the house of Shiv Charan Jamadar in village Rauni. On this information, the police party raided the said house. The complainant Ram Das Kushwaha and one Rakesh were made witnesses and no person of the village Rauni consented to become a witness. Thereafter, the police party came to village Rauni at about 09.00 a.m. at the house of Shiv Charan Jamadar. When they peeped into the house of Shiv Charan Jamadar then Ram Saran, Musheer, Iqbal, Shiv Kumar, Kalloo Jamadar (appellant) who is son of Shiv Charan Jamadar and Ram Niwas were sitting in the Courtyard and were talking to each other. The witnesses who were previously known to the accused persons disclosed their identity to the police. SSI Shri Vishnu Pratap Singh challenged the accused persons then accused Ram Niwas and Ram Saran opened fire with their country made rifle and gun. The police party escaped the said fires. The police also opened fire in their self defence. Ram Niwas, Iqbal and Kalloo Jamadar were apprehended on the spot by the police at 09.30 a.m. in the Courtyard of the house of appellant Kalloo Jamadar. Remaining miscreants namely Ram Saran, Musheer and Shiv Kumar made good their escape. On the search of the arrested accused persons, from the possession of Ram Niwas,


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top