SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 522

SUDHIR AGARWAL, SHASHI KANT
PHIRTU – Appellant
Versus
DURGAWATI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
R.S. Gupta for the Appellant.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—Heard Sri R.S. Gupta, learned counsel for defendant-appellant (herein after referred as ‘appellant’). Even in the revised list, none is present on behalf of plaintiffs-respondents (herein after referred as ‘respondents’), despite sufficient service upon them.

2. This first appeal has been filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1984’) against judgment and decree dated 22.4.2000 passed by Judge, Family Court, Azamgarh, in Original Suit No. 52 of 1996, whereby suit of plaintiff was partly decreed and Km. Jhuluri, respondent No. 2 was granted Rs. 2000/- as maintenance and legal expenses from June, 1980 to March, 1990 within one month from the date of order and regular payment of maintenance @ Rs. 500/- per month up to 10th of every month.

3. Filing of paper book by appellant is exempted vide order dated 2.4.2015.

4. Brief facts as transpire from record are that respondents filed Original Suit No. 52 of 1996 against appellant in Family Court, Azamgarh for grant of maintenance. Appellant appeared before learned Lower Court and contested suit by filing of written statement and adducing evidence.

5. On 31.8.1996, Court belo



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top