SUDHIR AGARWAL, BRIJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
LALLU PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
RAMPATIYA @ BILLI – Respondent
By the Court.—The delay in filing this appeal having been condoned vide order of date passed on Delay Condonation Application, let the appeal be registered with regular number and the old number shall also continue to be shown in bracket for finding out details of case, whenever required by parties with reference to either of the two number.
2. As requested by learned counsel for appellant, we proceed to hear the appeal for admission today itself.
3. Heard Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for appellant and perused the record.
4. The instant appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1984”) against the judgment and order dated 19.12.2014 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Kaushambi in Matrimonial Case No. 324 of 2013 (Lallu Prasad v. Smt. Rampatiya alias Billi) whereby divorce petition of plaintiff-appellant filed under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 1955”) has been dismissed with cost.
5. This appeal has been preferred on the ground that judgment and decree of Court below is based on assumptions and suppositions and learned Court below has failed to correctly app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.