SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 902

KRISHNA MURARI, PRATYUSH KUMAR
VINDHYACHAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Arun Kumar Singh and Man Bahadur Singh for the Appellant; C.S.C. and S.K. Mishra for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Krishna Murari, J.—Heard Shri Man Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the appellant learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Shri S.K. Mishra for respondent No. 5.

2. This intra Court appeal filed under the Rules of the Court is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.4.2015 passed by learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant challenging the order dated 14.10.2014 passed by District Inspector of Schools, Mau holding that petitioner-appellant lacks requisite qualification for appointment to the post of the Principal of the school.

3. There is an institution in the name of Bapu Inter College, Siyarahi, Mau, which is recognised upto Intermediate but grant-in-aid is provided only upto High School. The officiating Principal of the institution on attaining the age of superannuation retired on 30.6.2014. The District Inspector of Schools, who was functioning as authorised controller of the institution wrote a letter to handover the charge of the officiating Principal to the petitioner-appellant. Howeve























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top