SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 543

OM PRAKASH
ASHISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Ghan Shyam Das for the Revisionist; A.G.A. and Bratendra Singh for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII, J.

Heard Sri Ghan Shyam Das learned counsel for the revisionist (minor) as well as Sri Narendra Kumar Singh Yadav, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2. This revision petition under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2000') and Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 21.08.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (E.C. Act), Mainpuri, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Appellate Court') in Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2014, whereby the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal of the revisionist and upheld the judgement and order dated 04.04.2014 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Mainpuri in Bail Application No. Nil of 2014 filed in the Inquiry No. 45 of 2014 (State Vs. Ashish) arising out of Case Crime No. 469 of 2012 under Section 302 and 506 I.P.C. Police Station Bhongaon, District Mainpuri.

3. The allegation of offence against the revisionist is under Sections 302 and 506 IPC. The bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Act of 2000 before Juvenile Justice B



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top