Hon’ble Sudhir Kumar Saxena, J.—Tenant-revisionist has approached this Court for the third time, challenging the judgment and decree dated 9.2.2012 passed by Judge, Small Cause Court/Additional District Judge, Court No. 1, Rae Bareli decreeing S.C.C. Suit No. 03/2006, for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment from shop.

2. Civil revision No. 7 of 2012 was filed challenging the order dated 22.11.2011 passed by Judge, small cause Courts rejecting application under Section 23 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act. This revision was dismissed as infructuous on the statement of counsel for the revisionist on 20.1.2014.

3. Another revision No. 43 of 2009 challenging the order refusing to re-examine a witness filed by the revisionist, was also dismissed for non-prosecution.

4. Heard Sri Mohammad Ibrahim Abid-revisionist (in person), Sri Zainul Aabdin, counsel for the remaining revisionists, Sri Bireshwar Nath and Sri R.K. Sharma, counsels for the opposite parties.

5. Briefly stated relevant facts are that Sri Sameer Om and Sri Hari Om filed suit for ejectment of Sri Abid Hussain from the shop, which was let out to him @ Rs. 330/- per month (Rs. 300/- as rent and Rs. 30/- as