Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—All these three Contempt Applications (Criminal) have been registered against same person Shri Rakesh Agarwal, Advocate, practicing in District Judgeship, Bareilly (hereinafter referred to as “Contemnor”) and, hence, all these three contempt matters were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Shri R. A. Singh, Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bareilly, made a Reference dated 10th November, 2005 stating that Contemnor is a party in a large number of civil and criminal cases, revisions and appeals pending in different Courts of Bareilly Judgeship. Contemnor appears in person, moves applications and petitions personally and argues cases personally. Seven cases were received on transfer from Court of Sessions Judge, Bareilly, which are;

(I) Criminal Revision No. 334/2005, Rakesh Agarwal v. State of U.P.

(II) Criminal Revision No. 451/2004, Mukesh Porwal v. State of U.P.

(III) Criminal Revision No. 338/2004, Pankaj Singhal v. State of U.P.

(IV) Criminal Misc. Case No. 01/2005, Mukesh Porwal v. State of U.P.

(V) Criminal Misc. Case No. 02/2005, Pankaj Singhal v. State of U.P.

(VI) Criminal Misc. Case No. 03/2005, Pankaj Si