D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, YASHWANT VARMA
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, PUBLIC INTER COLLEGE RABUPURA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
By the Court.—The special appeal has arisen from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1 September 2015, which reads as follows:
“Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is allowed a month’s time to file counter-affidavit. List thereafter.”
2. The issue as to whether a special appeal would lie against an interim order of this nature has been dealt with in a recent judgment of the Full Bench Ashutosh Shrotriya v. Vice-Chancellor, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, 2015(8) ADJ 248 (FB). The Full Bench observed as follows:
“We, accordingly, are of the view that a direction issued by the learned Single Judge in the course of the hearing of a writ petition, calling for the filing of a counter and a rejoinder or, in other words, for the completion of pleadings is a direction of a procedural nature, in aid of the ultimate progression of the case. The object and purpose of such a direction is to enable the Single Judge to have the considered benefit of a response to the petition so as to enable the Court to deal with an application of an interlocutory nature upon a fair consideration of the rival perspectives and eventually for the purpose of the disposal of the case at the final st
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.