PANKAJ NAQVI
AWADHESH TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Jitendra Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for revisionist and learned A.G.A.
This criminal revision is preferred against the order dated 31.3.2015, passed by A.C.J.M.-I, Banda in Criminal Misc. Case No.580/XII/2015 (State v. Raj Kumar), under Section 207 M.V. Act and 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, P.S. Atarra, Banda, rejecting an application for release of the vehicle.
1. The revisionist claims to be the registered owner of Tata Truck-1613, bearing registration no. UP-78-AT 0427, which was alleged to be carrying sand more than the prescribed limit on 26.2.2015. The truck was seized and given in the custody of S.H.O., P.S. Atarra. The revisionist filed an application for release of the vehicle before the Magistrate concerned on 2.3.2015. The Mines Department on 4.3.2015 reported to the Magistrate that the truck was involved in an offence under Section 4/21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (fort short "the M.M.D.R. Act") and Rule 70(2) of the U.P. Minor Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 (for short "the Rules") and after realizing Rs.27,700/- as royalty, value of mineral / penalty,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.