BALA KRISHNA NARAYANA, VIJAY LAKSHMI
NAFIS AHMAD @ ACHCHEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent
(Delivered by Hon'ble Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi, J.)
This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to close down/ discontinue the history sheet no. 35-A dated 17.8.2001 opened against the petitioner, copy whereof has been filed as Annexure no. 2. The second prayer made by the petitioner is for quashing the order dated 24.6.2012 passed by the respondent no. 2 (Annexure no. 5), whereby the respondent no. 2 has dismissed the representation filed by the petitioner for closing his history-sheet.
Earlier, the petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 9651 of 2004, which was disposed of vide order dated 11.4.2012 of this court directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's representation with regard to closing of history sheet in accordance with law. The respondent no. 2 vide impugned order dated 24.6.2012 dismissed the representation of the petitioner.
We have heard Sri Kartikey Saran, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA representing all the respondents.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.