SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1302

RANJANA PANDYA
ARVIND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Sharad Malviya and Yogendra Singh Parihar for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

JUDGMENT :

Hon'ble Mrs. Ranjana Pandya,J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Mahoba dated 12.06.2015 in S.T. No. 148 of 2008, arising out of Case Crime No. 356 of 2008, under Sections 363, 366, 368, 376, 380 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Mahobkanth, District Mahoba, whereby the appellant was found guilty and convicted under Section 366 I.P.C. for five years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation, under Section 368 I.P.C. for five years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 2000/- with default stipulation and under Section 376 I.P.C. for seven years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 3000/- with default stipulation. All the sentences were to run concurrently.

2. Brief facts of the prosecution case is that, the first information report was lodged by the informant PW-1 Maan Singh on 29.04.2008 at 11:00 A.M. at the Police Station Mahobkanth stating that on 24.04.2008, his minor daughter Kumari Sanju aged about 15 years was enticed away by Arvind. His golden neckless weighing 25 gms., golden belt weighing 80 gms., four golden bangles weighing 2 tolas, silver Payal weighing 250 gms., other jewellery and Rs.









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top