SUDHIR AGARWAL, SHAMSHER BAHADUR SINGH
DEEPAK KUMAR YADAV – Appellant
Versus
K. K. MISHRA @ BALRAM ADVOCATE – Respondent
Hon’ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.—This criminal contempt application has been registered on reference dated 21.7.2011 of Sri Deepak Yadav, Civil Judge (Junior Division), (Purvi), Allahabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘Reference Officer’) stating that on 20th July, 2011 at about 2.15 p.m. Suits’ Clerk, Sri Rajmani Pandey put up record of Original Suit No. 1818 of 2003 (Siddh Nath v. Shanti Devi) alongwith application C-93. Written argument and a number of case laws were annexed with application C-93 which related to disposal of application 6-C, which had already been disposed of by Court concerned on 20.12.2010 pursuant to High Court’s order dated 12.11.2010. Consequently, Reference Officer disposed of application C-93 in accordance with Rule 28 of General Rules (Civil) and ordered return of aforesaid written argument and case laws annexed to the said application. Contemnor thereupon hurled abuses by making allegations of bribery and corruption against Reference Officer and alleged that written argument and case laws annexed to application C-93 have been ordered for return so that evidence of corruption against him may not come on record. Contemnor also threatened Reference Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.