SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1530

DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
SYED AMIRUL HAQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dr. Devendra Kumar Arora, J.—Heard Mr Amit Bose, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

2. Through the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned the validity of the order dated 20.2.2006 [Annexure-1 to the writ petition] whereby the petitioner has been removed from service by the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli. The petitioner has also assailed the appellate order dated 16.10.2006 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Varanasi Range, Varanasi contained in Annexure 12 to the writ petition as also the revisional order dated 3.9.2008/20.9.2008 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Varanasi Zone, Varanasi.

3. Brief facts of the case, in a narrow compass, are that while working as Constable at police-out post Tara Jeevanpur, Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli, the petitioner proceeded on three days leave on 16.12.2001 but he did not report for duties on expiry of sanctioned leave and as such, vide order dated 6.12.2003, the Superintendent of Police, Chandauli suspended the petitioner in contemplation of departmental inquiry on the ground of unauthorized absen



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top