By the Court.—Heard Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh, Advocate for appellant and Sri S. Shekhar, Advocate for respondent.

2. This is a defendant’s appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the “CPC”), which has arisen from the judgment dated 29.8.2002 and decree dated 5.9.2002 passed by Sri Rajbhan Singh, VIth Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad in Original Suit No. 321 of 1992, whereby the Court below has decreed suit and made a declaration that defendant-appellant is not entitled to recover 75% of auction money and interest thereon from plaintiff-respondent until it perform and complete the following works:

^^,- ys vkmV Iyku esa nf’kZr dE;qfuVh QsflfyVh dks deflZ;y dsUnz ds :i esa ifjofrZr u dj fn;k tk;A

c- deflZ;y dsUnz iw.kZ :i ls fodflr u dj fn;k tk;sA

l- tc rd fd oknxzLr IykV ,oa blds lehi vukf/kd`r vfrdze.k u gVk fn;k tk;A

n- lapkj lqfo/kk VsyhQksu] VsysDl iksLV vkWfQl dh lqfo/kk izfroknh }kjk iznRr u dj nh tk;sA**

“A. The community facility shown in the layout plan be not changed into commercial centre.

B. The commercial centre be not fully developed.

C. Till the time the unauthorised encroachment at the plot and in