SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1353

SUDHIR AGARWAL, BRIJESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA II
COLLECTOR, AGRA – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM BABU – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
S.C. for the Appellants; Santosh Kumar and Ashok Tripathi for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

By the Court.—This appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “Act 1894) has arisen from the award/judgment dated 23.11.1998 passed by Sri A.K. Roopanwal, Special Judge, E.C. Act/Additional District Judge, Agra in Land Acquisition Reference of 1993 (hereinafter referred to as LAR) No.179 of 1993, determining market value of acquired land at Rs. 237/- per sq. meter. Besides, it has also awarded 30% solatium, additional compensation of 12% and interest for various periods as per the provisions of Act 1894.

2. Grievance of the appellant State and its authority is that the rate determined by Court below is excessive, unjust and unreasonable. It has relied on an exemplar sale-deed, whereby a very small piece of land was transferred by sale though the area of disputed acquired land is 3 Bigha 9 Biswa and 10 Biswansi (8008 sq. meter) and for such a big plot exemplar of a minuscule piece of land ought not to have been applied.

3. The claimants-land owners have also filed cross objections under Order 41 Rule 22 C.P.C. claiming compensation









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top