SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1359

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
BEFORE : VIKRAM NATH AND PRATYUSH KUMAR, JJ.
HRIDESH KUMAR ....Appellant
Versus
STATE ….Opposite Party
(Criminal Appeal No. 1840 of 1980 with Government Appeal No. 2429 of 1980, Criminal Revision No. 1550 of 1980, decided on 27th August, 2015)

Advocates:
Counsel :
G.S. Chaturvedi, N.K. Chaturvedi, P.K. Tiwari, P.N. Misra and Apul Misra for the Appellant; A.G.A. for the Opposite Party.

Headnote:(Indian) Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302 and 328 – Murder – Conviction – Rat poison is sold with sufficient safeguards to prevent its accidental administration – Second reason against such accident it that no packaging material wherein rat poison is to be sold was found by police officer in house of appellant – When these facts are taken into consideration cumulatively, High Court think present case cannot be a case of accidental poison by deceased – Previous conduct of appellant under Section 8 of Evidence Act is relevant to show his state of mind and duly proved by evidence of prosecution, therefore, admissible to take into account – Thus, charge against him punishable under Section 302 and 328, IPC stand proved beyond doubt.

       Appeal Allowed.

Judgment :

(Delivered by Pratyush Kumar, J.)

Criminal Appeal No.1840 of 1980 has been filed under section 374 Cr.P.C. by accused/appellant Hirdesh Kumar challenging the correctness of judgment and order dated 25.8.1980 passed by Shri M. Wahaj Uddin, Sessions Judge, Agra in S.T. No.223 of 1979, State Vs. Hirdesh Kumar and others, under sections 302, 120-B, IPC, P.S. New Agra whereby he was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for life under section 302, IPC and further convicted under section 328, IPC and sentenced to eight years rigorous imprisonment with a direction that both the sentences would run concurrently. Government Appeal No.2429 of 1980, State Vs. Hirdesh Kumar has been filed on behalf of State of U.P. seeking enhancement of sentence of imprisonment for life to death sentence passed by the Sessions Judge in the said sessions trial, vide judgment and order dated 25.8.1980. Criminal Revision No.1550 of 1980 has been preferred by the first informant with a similar prayer as has been made in the Government Appeal. Since these three cases arise out of the same sessions trial assailing the validity of the same impugned judgment and order, we propose to dispose of all the three cases by a common judgment.

Briefly stated the prosecution story is that on 14.7.1977 at 8.30 a.m. at P.S. New Agra, Ganga Ram gave a written report stating therein that his daughter Bimla Devi was married to Hirdesh Kumar 2-1/2 years earlier. For dowry and domestic dispute his son-in-law Hirdesh Kumar, his father Om Prakash and his mother used to ill treat his daughter and abuse her. They used to talk about second marriage (of Hirdesh Kumar). Three months prior to the incident Hirdesh Kumar had called him to his house and said that his daughter could not be adjusted in his house. He should take her with him. For one month he had kept his daughter in his house, thereafter, they called her. He used to receive news from his daughter that her harassment continued as before. That day at 6.30 a.m. he received telephonic message from Hirdesh Kumar informing him that condition of Bimla was very serious. When he reached there, her condition was serious. She was attended by Dr. N.N. Khanna on his call. At about 9.00 a.m. she expired. He was sure that his daughter was murdered. He requested legal action against the guilty persons.

On this report chik FIR was scribed. Case crime no.241 of 1977 under section 302, IPC was registered and investigation started. Inquest proceedings were held, search of the premises was made. Sample of vomitus inside the room of Hirdesh Kumar along with DDT powder weighing 1/2 kg. kept in a wax paper was taken into possession. Recovery memos were prepared. From the dead body of Smt. Bimla ornaments golden as well as silver were taken off and given in custody of Hirdesh Kumar. From the room of Om Prakash Agarwal, father of Hirdesh Kumar five types of medicines were taken into possession and recovery memo was prepared. On the same day at 2.50 p.m. autopsy on the dead body of Smt. Bimla was conducted. Cause of death could not be ascertained and parts of internal organs were preserved. Viscera was preserved and along with petticoat bearing stool stain sample of vomit were sent for forensic examination. Witnesses were examined. Report of chemical analyst was obtained wherein it was opined that in all the aforementioned items Zinc Phosphide poison was found. Medicines taken from the room of Om Prakash Agarwal were found branded and unbranded medicines. In the sample of DDT Powder no Zinc Phosphide was found. The Investigating Officer prepared the site plan, examined the witnesses, completed the investigation and submitted the charge sheet against Hirdesh Kumar, Om Prakash and Angoori Devi.

Charges under sections 302, 328, 120B, IPC were framed against the accused persons. They pleaded not guilty. The prosecution in support of the charges has examined 16 witnesses. Statements of the accused persons were recorded under section 313, Cr.P.C

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top