SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(All) 1594

ADITYA NATH MITTAL
Arvind Kejriwal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri. Rishad Murtza, learned Government Advocate and perused the record.

This petition has been filed with the following prayers:—

(i) to quash the order dated 12.08.2015 in Criminal Case No.360 of 2014, 'State of U.P. v. Arvind Kejriwal' in pursuance of the Charge-Sheet No.122 of 2014 dated 09.07.2014 in Case Crime No.608 of 2014, under Section 125 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, Police Station-Kotwali Musafirkhana, District-Amethi, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musafirkhana, District-Amethi.

(ii) to stay the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.360 of 2014, 'State of U.P. v. Arvind Kejriwal' in pursuance of the Charge Sheet No.122 of 2014 dated 09.07.2014 in Case Crime No.608 of 2014, under Section 125 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, Police Station-Kotwali Musafirkhana, District-Amethi, pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Musafirkhana, District-Amethi, during pendency of the present case.

(iii) to order to concerned Hon’ble Court for deciding the pending application of the applicant filed under the proviso of Section 239, Cr.P.C. in Criminal Case No.360 of 2014, 'State of






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top